![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
curmugeonIt is puzzling when we have a President (The Village Idiot) willing to veto
a stem cell research bill because it terminates what some on the right term
life (an embryo), yet he will send a person to war to be killed, he will
allow the killing of innocent civilians and call it collateral damage, and
finally he will execute someone by lethal injection and support capital
punishment. Is there something contradictory there?
a stem cell research bill because it terminates what some on the right term
life (an embryo), yet he will send a person to war to be killed, he will
allow the killing of innocent civilians and call it collateral damage, and
finally he will execute someone by lethal injection and support capital
punishment. Is there something contradictory there?
