What I don't understand is: Why isn't Iraq using some of it's "Weapons of Mass Destruction" in this war? I mean, if they really do have them, wouldn't this be the time to break them out of storrage? And just as important: Why isn't anyone in the media asking this question?
WMD's is a weak excuse to invade Iraq. Yes, they have in the past used nerve gas and mustard gas on Iran and the Kurds, but we have Israel with 400 nuclear warheads, you have Korea with nukes, Pakistan has nukes, India has nukes, and so on and so on, but we are not disarming or invading them. There is got to bd some hidden agenda.
Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Date: 2003-03-30 01:56 am (UTC)BTW: I really am enjoying reading your journal.
Re: Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Date: 2003-03-30 05:39 am (UTC)